The Difference Between 2-D and 3-D Distinct Element Solution of Granular Materials.

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparison between Radial and Halbach Array PMLSM by Employing 2-D Electromagnetic Finite Element Analysis

The replacement of steam catapults with electromagnetic ones is becoming an overwhelming trend in aircraft launch systems. The Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) offers significant benefits to the aircraft, ship, personnel, and operational capabilities. EMALS has such advantages as high thrust, good controllability, reusable, etc., as a launching motor, a double-side plate Permanent...

متن کامل

Finite-Element Methods for Active Contour Models and Balloons for 2-D and 3-D Images

AbsfrucfThe use of energy-minimizing curves, known as “snakes” to extract features of interest in images has been introduced by Kass, Witkin and Tenopoulos [W]. A balloon model was introduced in [12] as a way to generalize and solve some of the problems encountered with the original method. A 3-D generalization of the balloon model as a 3-D deformable surface, which evolves in 3-D images, is pr...

متن کامل

on translation of phatic communion and socio-cultural relationships between the characters of the novels

phatic communion is a cultural concept which differs across cultures. according to hofstede (2001), the u.s. tends to have individualistic culture; however, asian countries tend to have collectivistic cultures. these cultures view phatic communion differently. in individualistic cultures like u.s., phatic communion reflects speakers’ socio-cultural relationships in conversations. to see whether...

15 صفحه اول

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the Society of Powder Technology, Japan

سال: 1995

ISSN: 0386-6157,1883-7239

DOI: 10.4164/sptj.32.16